Reordering

A major reordering scheme was proposed for the church. The Twentieth Century Society, though not a party opponent, objected that the proposed scheme would affect the integrity of the original design of the church by the Georgian architect Thomas Ford. The Chancellor took the view that the proposed scheme would have a significant effect on the interior of the church, but he was satisfied that the benefits would outweigh any harm. He accordingly granted a faculty.

The petition related to the disposal of an upright piano, which was beyond repair and the installation of a grand piano, which was a gift from a local arts charity. The installation of the grand piano had already been authorised by an Archdeacon's temporary licence and the petition sought approval for the installation to remain permanent. There were two objectors, who did not become parties opponent. The Diocesan Advisory Committee approved the proposals and all but one member of the Parochial Church Council (one of the objectors) voted in favour. The Chancellor granted a faculty.

A reordering scheme was proposed. The Victorian Society and the Church Buildings Council expressed concern about the following parts of the scheme: (1) the removal of the Victorian pews; (2) the introduction of plastic upholstered chairs; and (3) the introduction of carpeting to the north aisle. The Chancellor approved of the scheme, apart from the plastic upholstered chairs. She adjourned the proceedings for six months, to give the petitioners time to select an alternative type of chair and apply for an amendment of the faculty petition.

The Chancellor considered a faculty petition for internal works at the Grade I listed church of St Kenelm, Minster Lovell. The proposals included re-ordering the north transept to create a WC, servery and heritage/interpretation space, removing and adapting some mid-19th-century pews, installing a ramped accessible route (with possible removable handrails), relocating the war memorial, and creating a new accessible external path to the south door. Although the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings (SPAB) objected—mainly to pew removal, handrails in the crossing, and the handling of damp—the DAC ultimately did not object, subject to extensive conditions. Applying the Duffield test for listed churches, the Chancellor accepted that there would be some harm to the church’s significance, particularly from the loss and relocation of pews and visual intrusion, but found it limited and justified. The public benefits - improved accessibility, welcome, facilities for visitors and worshippers, heritage interpretation, and the long-term viability and mission of the church - were clear and convincing and outweighed the harm. A faculty was therefore granted, with detailed conditions to control design, conservation, drainage, ventilation, archaeology, and (if needed) handrails.

The Petition requested a Faculty to authorise a reordering of the west end of the church to include the installation of a toilet, some external drainage works, and a new porch door. Principles in Re St. Alkmund, Duffield (Court of Arches) considered. Faculty granted.

The rector and churchwardens petitioned for permission to remove from the west end of the church the redundant pipe organ, eight pews (to be replaced with chairs) and a number of items of redundant church furniture, in order to create a flexible circulation area at the back of the church. There were five objectors, who did not become parties opponent. The Chancellor was satisfied that the petitioners had made a convincing justification for the proposals and he accordingly granted a faculty.

In 2017 an Archdeacon's licence for temporary reordering was granted to allow the removal to storage of four pews and one pew frontal from the west end of the north side of the nave. The petitioners now sought permission to make the removal permanent, as it had facilitated use of the area for activities with children during services, for the taking of refreshments after services and for the positioning of wheelchairs. There was an objection from a parishioner. The Chancellor was satisfied that good reason had been shown to justify the proposal, and he accordingly granted a faculty.

The proposals were to complete a small kitchen/servery within a cupboard at the west end of the north aisle of the church; to remove some pews from the north aisle, to create a multi-purpose area, and to use wood from the removed pews for the servery cupboard; and to carry out some internal redecoration. The Chancellor granted a faculty, subject to conditions that (a) some form of ventilation, to be approved by the Diocesan Advisory Committee, should be provided to protect the memorials next to the kitchen/servery and (b) any chairs chosen to replace the pew seating removed should be the subject of a separate faculty petition and consultation with the amenity societies.

The Vicar and churchwardens sought permission to re-order the chancel area of the Grade II Victorian church by removing and disposing of the rear choir stalls and replacing them with the front stalls, carrying out some modifications to enlarge the leg-room available, making good any exposed tiles and laying carpet across the widened chancel aisle to match the nave aisle carpet. The object of the proposals was to make the use of the church by the children of the village school more convenient and effective and also increase the possibilities of using the building for concerts and community events. The Victorian Society objected to the covering of the Minton tiles with carpet. The Chancellor approved the proposals and granted a faculty.

The petitioners sought a faculty for an extension to be added to the north side of the church and for internal re-ordering, including replacement of the pews with partially upholstered chairs, some new furniture, disposal of the pulpit and lectern, the relocation of a chest tomb, and the introduction of a nave plinth. The Victorian Society argued that the loss of all the pews would rob the church of its character, and the removal of the pulpit could not be justified. Also, it did not consider upholstered seating appropriate. A number of parishioners also raised objections. Taking the proposals as a whole, the Chancellor was satisfied that they would provide a better environment for the varied worshipping needs of the church, community events and provision for children's activities. The Chancellor therefore granted a faculty.